Leadership in higher education: 14 pieces of food for thought

A useful little article from the Guardian HE network on some leadership tips.

There’s nothing here that might not already have been covered in LFHE courses, or in our own Leading for Success programme.

The article usefully concludes with a summary of desirable leadership qualities:

“Humility, competence, ability to simultaneously ‘own’ issues/stories and still give credit to those who did the hard work. Political skill, both internally and externally, is good . Never losing sight of the bigger picture, the ability to think and act strategically, compassion and a sense of humour”

Venture Capital and MOOCs

In “Venture Capital’s Massive, Terrible Idea For The Future Of College“, Maria Bustillos highlights some of the more interesting and less sensational issues around MOOCs.

She includes reference to a debate between” Aaron Bady and Clay Shirky who had an exchange recently on Inside Higher Ed that sheds light on the current thinking regarding MOOCs among academics.

“The two represent a certain polarity within the academy. Bady, known on Twitter and in the blogosphere aszunguzungu, is a Ph.D. student in African literature at UC Berkeley, where he teaches; he’s also a well-known writer on politics and culture. For all the edginess of his style and his high profile on social media, Bady is a newly-minted prof in the classic mold: a scholar largely concerned with learning (and teaching) from the past. Shirky, though he has taught at NYU for over a decade, is a hypermodern public intellectual and author, a mandarin of the Internet, focused on the future.”

The views of these two well know protagonists are expounded, together with an indication of where they agree. A useful diversion is provided of Richard Feynman teaching polarisation of light – always going to appeal to a physical scientist.

But in Maria’s concluding comments, we see:

“MOOCs are an essentially authoritarian structure; a one-way process in which the student is a passive recipient required to do nothing except “learn.” What he “learns” is only useful if it results in direct, measurable economic production. (Hence, for example, a degree in literature has an economic value of zero.) As a convenient by-product, the purveyors of this “education” can be “incentivized” by the profit motive. The invisible hand at work once again.

Or we can look at education as an interactive process whereby the job of the teacher is to encourage the student to think, thereby introducing him to an adult world in which he may devise a contributon of his own making.”

 

“Let’s put ourselves in the undergraduate student’s position. Someone eighteen years old, embarking on an academic career, might well ask: Will this world welcome me, welcome my potential abilities? Or am I being trained for a life on a hamster wheel? Is my value simply the value of a hamster that can run, a bioform for the Matrix to plug into and extract my essence for the benefit of a larger machine? Is this world full of possibilities, is it asking me to contribute, welcoming my contribution, valuing me for the things known and unknown that I may one day be able to contribute? Or am I being wronged from the start, treated as a “customer,” which all too often means, alas, someone to fleece?

Is the world full of smart and welcoming adults who are interested in what I have to say, encouraging me to work hard and learn and try things, or is it full of thieves and charlatans who are out to rip me off and saddle me with debt and enslave me before I even get a chance to start my adult life??

Let’s consider this from the educator’s point of view, as well. Doesn’t the quality of a culture rely in part on a deep, dynamic interaction between those who are adults now, and those who will be soon?”

The Week University (As We Know It) Ended – or more on MOOCs

The Week University (As We Know It) Ended was published in the Huffington Post, and is one of the most florid tub-thumping articles for MOOCs I have yet read.

Don Tapscott, reporting from Davos, writes:

“At one session here at Davos, the presidents of Harvard, Stanford and MIT all readily acknowledged that the experiments in new models of online learning will soon radically disrupt higher learning.

One expert suggested many universities are facing the early days of bankruptcy. Another predicted there may only be 10 universities that survive this transition.”

Wow. Just 10 universities.

Mind you  in the same article he refers to Sebastian Thrun ” Google vice-president. He led the team that developed the Google self-driving cars that have circled the globe taking pictures of streetscapes for its Street View service.”.

Google has developed a self driving car. Fact. Google have produced streetscapes using Street View. fact. Google HAVE NOT used self driving cars to photograph streetscapes. This is poorly researched journalistic hyperbole.

Maybe the rest of his article should be treated with a suitably large pinch of salt.

 

The Gender Gap at Universities

More from the Guardian Datablog

This time the table below shows student numbers in 2010-11, by gender, and sorted in order, of institutions with the highest percentage of male students.

Nationally 55% of undergraduates are female, and the trend is for the number of female students to continue to increase.

Number and proportion of students at higher education institutions, by gender 2010-11
Institution % female full-time undergraduates % male full-time undergraduates
1 Leeds College of Music 21.4 77.9
2 Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine 34.0 66.1
3 Loughborough University 38.0 62.0
4 Swansea Metropolitan University 41.2 59.0
5 Heriot-Watt University 41.3 58.7
6 Ravensbourne 42.9 57.1
7 Southampton Solent University 43.9 56.1
8 The University of Bath 43.9 56.1
9 The University of Buckingham 44.4 55.6
10 Staffordshire University 44.5 55.4
11 Scottish Agricultural College 44.2 55.2
12 The University of Portsmouth 45.2 54.8
13 Birkbeck College(#9) 45.2 54.8
14 Heythrop College(#9) 45.7 54.3
15 The University of Oxford 45.8 54.2
16 Brunel University 46.1 53.9
17 Royal Northern College of Music 47.5 53.5
18 The Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts 46.7 53.3
19 The University of Cambridge(#12) 46.9 53.1
20 Royal Agricultural College 47.7 52.9
22 Aston University 47.2 52.8
23 The University of Bolton 47.3 52.7
24 The University of Warwick 47.6 52.4
25 Aberystwyth University 48.0 52.0
26 University of Abertay Dundee 48.3 51.7
27 Coventry University 48.4 51.6
28 Royal Academy of Music(#9) 49.3 50.7
29 Royal College of Music 49.3 50.7
30 The University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne 49.3 50.7
32 Harper Adams University College 49.1 50.6
33 The University of Sheffield 49.8 50.2
34 University of Glamorgan 50.0 50.0
35 Guildhall School of Music and Drama 50.0 50.0
36 The Open University 50.0 50.0
37 London School of Economics and Political Science(#9) 50.3 49.7
38 University College London(#9) 50.7 49.3
39 The University of Strathclyde 50.9 49.1
40 Swansea University 51.0 49.0
41 Leeds Metropolitan University 51.3 48.7
42 The University of Leicester 51.5 48.5
43 University of Durham 51.5 48.5
44 Kingston University 51.9 48.1
45 Queen Mary and Westfield College(#9) 51.8 48.1
46 The University of Hull 51.9 48.1
47 The University of Bristol 52.1 47.9
48 The University of Bradford 52.3 47.6
49 Rose Bruford College 52.5 47.5
50 Liverpool John Moores University 52.7 47.3
51 The University of Lancaster 52.7 47.3
52 The University of Huddersfield 52.8 47.2
53 The University of Plymouth 53.1 46.9
54 The University of Liverpool 53.1 46.9
55 University of Hertfordshire 53.2 46.8
56 The University of Salford 53.2 46.8
57 The University of Exeter 53.2 46.8
58 The University of Manchester 53.3 46.7
59 University of Wales Trinity Saint David(#7)(#8) 53.3 46.7
60 The University of Southampton 53.4 46.6
61 Bournemouth University 53.4 46.6
62 The University of Kent 53.4 46.6
63 The University of Aberdeen 53.5 46.5
64 The University of Essex 53.5 46.5
65 The University of York 53.5 46.5
66 The University of Reading 53.6 46.4
67 The University of East London 53.6 46.4
68 Teesside University(#8) 53.8 46.2
69 University of Derby 54.0 46.0
72 The Nottingham Trent University 54.0 46.0
73 University of the West of England, Bristol 54.1 45.9
74 Glynd?r University 54.0 45.8
76 The University of Sunderland 54.4 45.6
77 University of the Highlands and Islands(#8) 54.4 45.6
78 The University of Greenwich 54.8 45.2
79 Sheffield Hallam University 54.8 45.2
80 The University of Wales, Newport 55.0 45.0
81 The University of Northumbria at Newcastle 55.1 44.9
82 Total UK 50.9 49.1
83 The University of Sussex 55.1 44.9
84 Royal Conservatoire of Scotland(#8) 55.2 44.8
85 Oxford Brookes University 55.3 44.7
86 The University of Birmingham 55.3 44.7
87 The University of Nottingham 55.4 44.6
88 Edinburgh Napier University 55.5 44.5
89 The University of Edinburgh 55.7 44.3
90 The University of Keele 55.9 44.1
91 Cardiff Metropolitan University(#8) 56.0 44.1
92 The Manchester Metropolitan University 56.1 43.9
93 The University of Westminster 56.2 43.8
94 The University of Glasgow 56.2 43.8
95 De Montfort University 56.3 43.7
96 The University of Central Lancashire 56.4 43.6
97 The University of Brighton 56.4 43.6
98 The University of East Anglia 56.4 43.6
99 Bangor University 56.5 43.5
101 The Queen’s University of Belfast 56.5 43.5
102 The City University 56.9 43.1
103 Buckinghamshire New University 57.0 43.0
104 London Metropolitan University 57.0 43.0
105 University of Ulster 57.1 42.9
106 London South Bank University 57.2 42.8
107 Cardiff University 57.6 42.4
108 University College Falmouth 57.6 42.4
109 The University of Wolverhampton 57.8 42.2
110 Trinity Laban Conservatoire of Music and Dance 57.8 42.2
111 The University of Surrey 57.8 42.2
112 The University of St Andrews 57.9 42.1
113 University of Gloucestershire 58.0 42.0
114 The University of Lincoln 58.3 41.7
115 The University of Leeds 58.3 41.7
116 St George’s Hospital Medical School(#9) 58.6 41.4
117 Royal Holloway and Bedford New College(#9) 58.8 41.2
118 The University of West London(#8) 59.2 40.8
119 Conservatoire for Dance and Drama 59.2 40.8
120 The University of Chichester 59.5 40.5
121 Norwich University College of the Arts 59.5 40.5
122 St Mary’s University College, Twickenham 59.8 40.2
123 University of Bedfordshire 60.2 39.8
124 Middlesex University 60.2 39.8
125 The University of the West of Scotland 60.8 39.2
126 The School of Oriental and African Studies(#9) 60.8 39.2
127 King’s College London(#9) 61.0 39.0
128 Central School of Speech and Drama(#9) 61.2 38.8
129 Anglia Ruskin University 61.9 38.1
130 The University of Worcester 62.2 37.8
131 Glasgow Caledonian University 62.3 37.7
132 University College Plymouth St Mark and St John 62.2 37.6
133 The University of Dundee 62.6 37.4
134 Birmingham City University 62.8 37.2
135 The University of Stirling 62.9 37.1
136 The Arts University College at Bournemouth 63.0 37.0
137 University College Birmingham 63.9 36.1
138 The Robert Gordon University 64.0 36.0
139 Edinburgh College of Art 64.6 35.8
140 Goldsmiths College(#9) 64.3 35.7
141 Canterbury Christ Church University 64.4 35.6
142 Glasgow School of Art 64.5 35.5
143 Writtle College 64.2 35.2
144 The University of Northampton 64.9 35.1
145 University for the Creative Arts 65.5 34.6
146 Leeds Trinity University College 65.5 34.5
147 The School of Pharmacy(#9) 67.1 32.9
148 York St John University 67.2 32.8
149 Edge Hill University 67.4 32.6
150 Bath Spa University 67.5 32.5
151 The University of Winchester 67.8 32.2
152 University of Chester 67.9 32.1
153 University of Cumbria 69.2 30.8
154 St Mary’s University College 70.9 29.1
155 University Campus Suffolk 71.5 28.5
156 University of the Arts, London 72.5 27.5
157 Liverpool Hope University 73.3 26.8
158 Roehampton University 74.6 25.4
159 Newman University College 74.6 25.2
160 Stranmillis University College 77.4 22.6
163 The Royal Veterinary College(#9) 79.2 20.8
164 Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh 79.5 20.5
165 Courtauld Institute of Art(#9) 83.3 20.0
166 Bishop Grosseteste University College Lincoln 80.2 19.8
Institute of Education(#9) 85.7 10.7

 

The Gender Gap at Universities – what students choose to study

Published on the Guardian datablog site today, some data about gender of students, the subjects that they study and their attainment .

The table below shows the changes in student numbers over the last 5 years, both by gender and total number of students

Interesting points? The only subject areas to show overall decline are computer science and combined awards. the latter can be explained by the he move fo so many institutions towards a tighter more managed portfolio of awards. The former is a worry – we know that there is a shortage of well qualified computer scientists, and we have the very real problem of working with schools to get young people to recognise what the subject is  actually about (not ICT!)

Higher education qualifications obtained by students (postgrad and undergrad) in the UK by gender and subject area, 2011/12
Number of female students Number of male students Total students % female % male % change in female students from 2006-07/ 2011-12 % change in male students from 2006-07/ 2011-12 % change in students from 2006-07/ 2011-12
Medicine & dentistry 10650 7555 18200 58.5 41.5 31.7 28.6 30.4
Subjects allied to medicine 68470 17280 85750 79.8 20.2 -2.4 21.7 1.6
Biological sciences 34450 20970 55420 62.2 37.8 23.5 38.8 28.9
Veterinary science 875 255 1135 77.1 22.5 52.2 -3.8 35.1
Agriculture & related subjects 3635 2255 5885 61.8 38.3 24.7 22.9 23.9
Physical sciences 11110 15100 26210 42.4 57.6 18.6 27.5 23.6
Mathematical sciences 4720 6765 11485 41.1 58.9 38.6 25.9 30.8
Computer science 5750 24765 30520 18.8 81.1 -11.1 -0.2 -2.4
Engineering & technology 8595 42085 50680 17.0 83.0 36.0 30.3 31.2
Architecture, building & planning 7340 14405 21745 33.8 66.2 30.8 27.1 28.4
Total – Science subject areas 155585 151440 307025 50.7 49.3 10.5 23.2 16.4
Social studies 46255 27485 73740 62.7 37.3 22.7 21.1 22.1
Law 19585 13480 33065 59.2 40.8 8.0 10.5 9.0
Business & administrative studies 69655 70370 140020 49.7 50.3 41.8 45.0 43.3
Mass communications & documentation 11815 8090 19905 59.4 40.6 27.9 33.4 30.1
Languages 25345 11495 36845 68.8 31.2 14.8 22.7 17.2
Historical & philosophical studies 15000 13170 28170 53.2 46.8 8.3 15.5 11.6
Creative arts & design 37755 23535 61285 61.6 38.4 32.2 30.5 31.5
Education 61430 18915 80340 76.5 23.5 13.7 3.8 11.2
Combined 4100 2705 6810 60.2 39.7 -14.0 -17.4 -15.4

This week’s news on MOOCs

And still MOOCs are the dish of the day, in meetings around HEIs, and in the pages of the Higher.

I have to confess to having decided which side of the fence I sit on (although I might be persuaded to change) – MOOCs may  look great, but they are not for every University to pursue, and they won’t sound the death knell for every University, despite Clay Shirky saying this is the Naptster moment for higher education. Napster changed the music industry  but it didn’t kill it – people still go out to buy the music experiences they need. And these aren’t just digital downloads – a live gig is still pretty important!

Anyway, onto this week’s coverage.

Firstly the VC of Cambridge warns of massive threat posed by MOOCs. saying that ” less prestigious universities that focused on teaching rather than research could struggle in the face of new online courses. For those in the knowledge-transfer system, there are troubled times ahead.”. However, ” online courses did not pose a threat to Cambridge because they could not replicate the debate and discussion central to the university’s tutorial system”. So that’s alright then. Of course, MOOCs also won’t be able to replace what we do in our studios, in our labs, our workshops, our seminar sessions, and yes – in our personal tutorials. If we are smart, what we will do is exploit the existing digital resources out there, and base our proposition on the support we give to students, and the importance of the social aspects of learning.

In the same week in the Higher, “Online study certificates go on sale, but Coursera’s Andrew Ng tells Chris Parr they won’t match traditional degrees“. Coursera has started to charge for accreditation of completion of some of its online courses, but one of the founders of the company recognises that this  will never be as valuable as the currency of a traditional degree from a prestigious university. He does point out the benefit to existing graduates of using MOOCs to top up and refresh knowledge, and to receive certification that have done so.

Leadership in Higher Education – a new publication

An old friend and onetime colleague of mine who publishes a popular blog has written about a recent Leadership Foundation publication on “What do we know about leadership in higher education.”

Dr Greatrix writes that “We seem to be clutching at straws in trying to establish whether there is any evidence for leadership benefiting universities in terms of their core activities:

Evidence of the impact of leadership on the extent and quality of research, learning and enterprise is rather slim.

Moreover, university staff inevitably have contrasting views on what effectiveness means, what its characteristics are and indeed whether individuals can even be described in this way:

What works in one context will not necessarily work ?in another, and equally may be judged as effective? and ineffective in the same context. As in the wider literature, the research generates lists of characteristics ?of effective leaders that are somewhat idealised and apolitical. Oppositional narratives underpin estimates of effectiveness; a rational narrative stresses data-driven, command and control, while an alternative prizes an open- ended and fluid creation of space in which autonomy can flourish. Effectiveness is currently related to individuals, but might be more usefully applied to units.”

This might all be a little depressing, particularly for universities who have invested significant amounts of time and money in leadership development for their senior staff. Personally  I find the short mantra of Rob Goffee and Gareth Jones (authors of “Why Should Anyone be Led by You”) a useful way of viewing leadership – Be Yourself, More, With Skill.

 

 

 

More on BME Attainment

One of the reasons I look at this is because I am tasked with trying to increase the number of “good” degrees, ie 1sts and 2(i)s that we award.

It is obvious that if certain groups of students are less successful than others, then we need to understand why, and in so doing make sure that that all of our students have the same opportunities to succeed.

The Higher (24th January 2013) in an article “Black students reluctant to seek aid”, suggests that a reason for lower attainment might be because of a reluctance to seek help from lecturers. the suggestion is that unversities need to be more proactive in ensuring that black students access the academic support on offer.

 

In an era of increasing class sizes, this will be a challenge – if we can develop personal tutoring systems or encourage enough small group teaching  with formative feedback opportunities, we may be better placed  to identify when any of our students need extra support.

More details of the research carried out by Jacqueline Stevenson of Leeds Met can be downloaded from here.

Different Approaches to KIS

Next week I am delivering a session to one of our faulty management teams on Key Information Sets (KIS) – specifically trying to help colleagues generate a better understanding,  especially of what data can and can’t be influenced by the university.

Ultimately, all of the factors reported can be influenced – they only show what has been previously measured  either by an institutional response specific to KIS, through HESA returns, or through the opinions and outcomes of our former students.

As Graham Gibbs has pointed out – see earlier post – the factors being measured and reported do not necessarily represent those, that would necessarily lead to educational gains for students  after interventions.

However, I was interested to see what our two main rivals (hem hem) Oxford and Cambridge do….

Cambridge, under each KIS widget, provide a list of reasons why KIS should not be considered in isolation, and may not be the most useful way of making comparisons.

Oxford on the other hand are more direct. They have their own graphic  right above the KIS one with a clear statement of what their students will get. Maybe we could do the same with Staffordshire Graduate?

Oxford KIS button

UCAS Enrolment figures for 2011 and 2012 – lessons to be learnt?

The latest UCAS figures for the last cycles of enrollments and acceptances has been published, and commented upon in the Higher.

“Data released by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service on 18 January reveal the full extent of shortfalls in undergraduate numbers by institution, showing that the government’s reforms have produced often wild variations in recruitment.

The figures relate to acceptances, meaning actual enrolments could be different. They also include overseas students who applied via Ucas. However, the data do not include students who applied directly (via access courses, for example).

Some in the sector suggest that declining post-1992 university figures indicate that students from disadvantaged backgrounds are most likely to decide against higher education with higher fees”

although

“The post-1992s that increased their intake appear to be largely drawn from those that won places under the margin system, which reallocates places to cheaper institutions.”

 

The table below shows the percentage change between 2011 and 2012, sorted by size of change. Staffs comes out pretty much mid-table this way, and it is interesting to see where our competitors are.

Institution Name 2012 2011 Change in number of places Change %
American InterContinental University – London 56 6 50 833.3
Birkbeck, University of London 664 289 375 129.8
Richmond, The American International University in London 89 40 49 122.5
Regent’s College, London (incorporating Regent’s Business School, London) 78 46 32 69.6
European Business School, London 100 68 32 47.1
University of Stirling 1765 1253 512 40.9
University of Bristol 4717 3688 1029 27.9
University College London 4397 3617 780 21.6
University of Aberdeen 2900 2400 500 20.8
Glasgow School of Art 389 334 55 16.5
Ravensbourne 811 705 106 15.0
Royal Veterinary College, University of London 373 327 46 14.1
Royal Academy of Dance 58 51 7 13.7
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 986 870 116 13.3
Cardiff University 5799 5130 669 13.0
King’s College London, University of London 4331 3881 450 11.6
London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London 1416 1271 145 11.4
University of Edinburgh 5474 4951 523 10.6
York St John University 1638 1492 146 9.8
Queen Margaret University , Edinburgh 1107 1014 93 9.2
University of Winchester 1915 1756 159 9.1
Harper Adams University 792 731 61 8.3
BPP University College 1041 962 79 8.2
Aston University 2141 1992 149 7.5
Anglia Ruskin University 4362 4,065 297 7.3
Newcastle University 4669 4357 312 7.2
Coventry University 5432 5107 325 6.4
University of Glasgow 4406 4149 257 6.2
Durham University 4026 3800 226 5.9
University of Ulster 5675 5360 315 5.9
University of Bath 2990 2832 158 5.6
Bishop Grosseteste University 612 580 32 5.5
University of Chichester 1589 1511 78 5.2
Queen’s University Belfast 3920 3736 184 4.9
Robert Gordon University 2423 2321 102 4.4
University of Chester 3064 2936 128 4.4
University of Cambridge 3401 3261 140 4.3
Norwich University Of The Arts 635 609 26 4.3
Central School of Speech and Drama, University of London 233 224 9 4.0
Brighton and Sussex Medical School 141 136 5 3.7
Hull York Medical School 147 142 5 3.5
Goldsmiths, University of London 1800 1743 57 3.3
University of Exeter 4356 4220 136 3.2
University of Strathclyde 2899 2822 77 2.7
Falmouth University 1443 1410 33 2.3
Buckinghamshire New University 2379 2327 52 2.2
University of Huddersfield 4962 4866 96 2.0
Birmingham City University 5308 5214 94 1.8
University of Brighton 5417 5326 91 1.7
St George’s, University of London (formerly St George’s Hospital Medical School) 657 646 11 1.7
Glasgow Caledonian University 3530 3473 57 1.6
Bangor University 2410 2372 38 1.6
University of Oxford 3281 3237 44 1.4
University of York 3749 3701 48 1.3
University of East Anglia 3540 3505 35 1.0
St Mary’s University College, Twickenham 1245 1237 8 0.6
University of Sussex 3221 3203 18 0.6
University of the Highlands and Islands 2161 2153 8 0.4
University of Leicester 3114 3113 1 0.0
University of Reading 2945 2948 -3 -0.1
University of Portsmouth 5289 5305 -16 -0.3
University of Nottingham 7160 7187 -27 -0.4
University of Warwick 3828 3846 -18 -0.5
UCP Marjon 800 806 -6 -0.7
Swansea Metropolitan University 1425 1446 -21 -1.5
Rose Bruford College 213 217 -4 -1.8
University College Birmingham 1312 1337 -25 -1.9
University of Northampton 3017 3079 -62 -2.0
Cardiff Metropolitan University 2646 2704 -58 -2.1
Loughborough University 3359 3439 -80 -2.3
University of St Andrews 1696 1741 -45 -2.6
Staffordshire University 3790 3895 -105 -2.7
Southampton Solent University 3810 3920 -110 -2.8
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh 1814 1872 -58 -3.1
University of Manchester 7861 8114 -253 -3.1
Royal Holloway, University of London 2375 2452 -77 -3.1
Oxford Brookes University 3810 3934 -124 -3.2
Lancaster University 2778 2882 -104 -3.6
Courtauld Institute of Art, University of London 51 53 -2 -3.8
Leeds Trinity University 870 905 -35 -3.9
City University 2880 2997 -117 -3.9
London South Bank University 3740 3893 -153 -3.9
University of Abertay Dundee 1242 1301 -59 -4.5
Bath Spa University 1919 2021 -102 -5.0
University of Wolverhampton 4587 4855 -268 -5.5
Arts University College at Bournemouth 953 1011 -58 -5.7
Queen Mary, University of London 3484 3704 -220 -5.9
Keele University 2023 2153 -130 -6.0
University of Leeds 6428 6844 -416 -6.1
Imperial College London 2226 2377 -151 -6.4
University of the West of Scotland 4228 4516 -288 -6.4
Canterbury Christ Church University 3675 3927 -252 -6.4
University of Kent 4942 5281 -339 -6.4
University of Birmingham 5135 5520 -385 -7.0
Nottingham Trent University 6356 6857 -501 -7.3
ifs School of Finance 36 39 -3 -7.7
University of the Arts London 4305 4665 -360 -7.7
University of Gloucestershire 2215 2403 -188 -7.8
Stranmillis University College: A College of Queen’s University Belfast 244 265 -21 -7.9
University of Worcester 2681 2919 -238 -8.2
University of Essex 2907 3166 -259 -8.2
Roehampton University 2254 2455 -201 -8.2
Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts 219 240 -21 -8.8
Kingston University 6210 6809 -599 -8.8
Edge Hill University 3550 3900 -350 -9.0
Northumbria University 5714 6290 -576 -9.2
University of Sheffield 4711 5197 -486 -9.4
Sheffield Hallam University 7425 8211 -786 -9.6
University of the West of England, Bristol 6584 7284 -700 -9.6
Edinburgh Napier University 3480 3854 -374 -9.7
University of Liverpool 3945 4369 -424 -9.7
Bournemouth University 3920 4342 -422 -9.7
Middlesex University 4139 4619 -480 -10.4
University of Hull 4356 4880 -524 -10.7
De Montfort University 4638 5230 -592 -11.3
University of Bedfordshire 3815 4303 -488 -11.3
University of Westminster 4503 5088 -585 -11.5
University of Sunderland 2503 2831 -328 -11.6
Swansea University 2939 3326 -387 -11.6
British School of Osteopathy 69 79 -10 -12.7
Plymouth University 5173 5923 -750 -12.7
University of West London 2394 2742 -348 -12.7
Liverpool John Moores University 5473 6284 -811 -12.9
University of Southampton 4499 5189 -690 -13.3
Brunel University 2821 3279 -458 -14.0
Royal Agricultural College 313 364 -51 -14.0
University of Derby 3002 3555 -553 -15.6
University of Lincoln 3135 3715 -580 -15.6
University of Hertfordshire 4730 5618 -888 -15.8
Manchester Metropolitan University 7642 9083 -1441 -15.9
Liverpool Hope University 1476 1760 -284 -16.1
University of Central Lancashire 5318 6355 -1037 -16.3
University for the Creative Arts 1727 2064 -337 -16.3
University of Surrey 2104 2515 -411 -16.3
University of Salford 3953 4808 -855 -17.8
University of London Institute in Paris 49 60 -11 -18.3
University of Cumbria 1950 2391 -441 -18.4
University of Bradford 2748 3377 -629 -18.6
University of Dundee 2141 2637 -496 -18.8
Newman University College, Birmingham 535 659 -124 -18.8
Aberystwyth University 2655 3283 -628 -19.1
University of Wales, Newport 1147 1426 -279 -19.6
University of East London 4385 5510 -1125 -20.4
University of Glamorgan, Cardiff and Pontypridd 3265 4105 -840 -20.5
Glyndwr University 731 926 -195 -21.1
Scottish Agricultural College 275 350 -75 -21.4
Heythrop College, University of London 149 192 -43 -22.4
Leeds Metropolitan University 6265 8084 -1819 -22.5
University of Greenwich 4034 5223 -1189 -22.8
University Campus Suffolk 1398 1811 -413 -22.8
Peninsula College of Medicine & Dentistry 239 319 -80 -25.1
University of Bolton 1259 1686 -427 -25.3
University of Wales Trinity Saint David 821 1156 -335 -29.0
University of Buckingham 157 244 -87 -35.7
Writtle College 293 458 -165 -36.0
London Metropolitan University 4079 7209 -3130 -43.4
Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama (Coleg Brenhinol Cerdd a Drama Cymru) 31 60 -29 -48.3
Institute of Education, University of London 28